Earned Settlement judicial review
Challenging the government's consultation (CP 1448), which proposes to double settlement waiting times starting April 2026.
- 12 February 2026
- Consultation closes
- April 2026
- Policy takes effect
- 5 to 10 years
- Skilled Worker, RQF 6 and above
- 5 to 15 years
- Health and Care, and below RQF 6
Policy at a glance: what is changing
Government consultation CP 1448 proposes to drastically increase settlement waiting periods, affecting hundreds of thousands already in the UK who were promised a 5-year route.
Deadline: consultation closes 12 February 2026
The consultation closes on 12 February 2026, with implementation planned for April 2026. That gives a narrow window to respond and to mount a legal challenge.
- Skilled Worker (RQF 6+) - before
- 5 years
- Skilled Worker (RQF 6+) - after April 2026
- 10 years
- Skilled Worker (below RQF 6) - before
- 5 years
- Skilled Worker (below RQF 6) - after April 2026
- 15 years
- Health and Care Worker - before
- 5 years
- Health and Care Worker - after April 2026
- 15 years
RQF (Regulated Qualifications Framework) Level 6 refers to roles requiring bachelor's degree-level skills. Examples include software engineers, doctors, accountants, and most professional roles. Jobs below RQF Level 6 include care workers, administrative assistants, and some technical roles that do not require a degree.
No transitional protection
These changes will apply to everyone, including those already in the UK who were promised a 5-year route.
Key facts about the consultation
616,000
Health and Care visas issued between 2022-2024 alone.
1.6M
People forecast for settlement 2026-2030 under old rules.
15 years
New wait time for Health and Care and below RQF 6 roles: triple the promise.
No protections
Transitional protection offered to existing visa holders.
What is the Earned Settlement consultation?
In November 2025, the UK government launched consultation CP 1448 proposing dramatic changes to settlement rules. Under the guise of "Earned Settlement", the government wants to double the waiting period from 5 to 10 years for Skilled Workers in degree-level roles (RQF Level 6 and above), and triple it from 5 to 15 years for Health and Care Workers and Skilled Workers in roles below RQF Level 6.
Most critically, these changes will apply retrospectively to everyone, including the hundreds of thousands already in the UK who were promised a 5-year route when they accepted jobs, moved their families and built their lives here. There are no transitional arrangements, no grandfathering, and no protection for those who relied on the government's promise.
We are preparing a collective judicial review to challenge this policy on grounds of legitimate expectation, retrospective application, and violation of basic fairness principles.
Who can join this collective action
You may be eligible if you meet any of the following criteria.
Skilled Worker visa holders
Currently on a Skilled Worker visa (or predecessor Tier 2); entered the UK before November 2025 when the consultation was announced; expected to apply for ILR after 5 years of residence. RQF Level 6+ roles move from 5 to 10 years, and below RQF Level 6 roles from 5 to 15 years.
Health and Care Workers
Currently on a Health and Care Worker visa; came to the UK to work in the NHS or care sector after 2022; were promised the 5-year route when accepting a job offer, and now face a tripled wait time of 15 years.
Family members
Spouse or partner of an affected work visa holder, children whose settlement timeline is affected, and family units disrupted by the policy change.
Supporters
Employers sponsoring affected workers, professional bodies and unions, and anyone supporting fairness in immigration policy.
Why this matters
Economic contribution
Skilled migrants contribute billions to the UK economy annually, pay significant taxes, and fill critical workforce gaps across sectors including healthcare, technology and engineering.
Settled lives
Many migrants have built their lives in the UK, bought homes, started families, and integrated into communities, based on the reasonable expectation of the 10-year route to settlement.
Legal precedent
This case will establish important legal principles about legitimate expectation, fairness in immigration policy, and the government's duty to provide adequate transitional arrangements.
Why this policy is legally challengeable
1. Legitimate expectation
Skilled workers and Health and Care workers entered the UK under explicit 5-year settlement rules published in official Immigration Rules and government guidance. They made life-altering decisions (accepting jobs, relocating families, purchasing homes) based on the clear and unambiguous promise of a 5-year route to settlement. This creates a legally protected legitimate expectation.
2. Retrospective application
The consultation proposes to apply new 10-15 year requirements to people already in the UK on existing visas. This is retrospective rule-changing mid-journey. Those who entered under one set of rules should not have the goalposts moved after they've already committed to the UK.
3. No transitional protection
The government has offered zero transitional provisions or grandfathering arrangements. No protection for those who accepted job offers under the 5-year promise. No savings provisions for those mid-way through their journey. This failure to protect existing rights is procedurally unfair and legally questionable.
4. Disproportionate impact on health workers
Health and Care workers face a tripled wait time, from 5 to 15 years. These are the same workers the UK actively recruited during and after COVID-19. Many came from Commonwealth countries specifically because the UK government promised them a pathway to settlement. Tripling their wait time after they have dedicated years to the NHS is manifestly unfair and potentially discriminatory.
5. Human rights considerations
Article 8 ECHR protects the right to private and family life. Migrants have established deep roots in the UK: children in schools, property ownership, community ties, established careers. Dramatically extending their limbo period interferes with these rights without adequate justification and proportionality.
Timeline: how we got here
- 12022
Health and Care visa route launched
The UK actively recruits healthcare workers with the promise of a 5-year settlement route.
- 22022-2024
616,000 Health and Care visas issued
Massive recruitment of skilled and healthcare workers to the UK.
- 32024
Migrants build lives in the UK
Buy homes, start families, integrate into communities, all expecting the 5-year route.
- 4May 2025
Immigration White Paper hints at changes
First signals that settlement routes may be restricted.
- 5Nov 2025
CP 1448 consultation launched
Government proposes doubling and tripling wait times with no transitional protection.
- 612 Feb 2026
Consultation closes
Final date to submit responses and prepare the legal challenge.
- 7April 2026
New rules take effect
Implementation date for the 10 and 15 year settlement requirements.
- 82026
Our response: judicial review
Filing collective action to challenge the unfair policy change.
- 12022
Health and Care visa route launched
The UK actively recruits healthcare workers with the promise of a 5-year settlement route.
- 22022-2024
616,000 Health and Care visas issued
Massive recruitment of skilled and healthcare workers to the UK.
- 32024
Migrants build lives in the UK
Buy homes, start families, integrate into communities, all expecting the 5-year route.
- 4May 2025
Immigration White Paper hints at changes
First signals that settlement routes may be restricted.
- 5Nov 2025
CP 1448 consultation launched
Government proposes doubling and tripling wait times with no transitional protection.
- 612 Feb 2026
Consultation closes
Final date to submit responses and prepare the legal challenge.
- 7April 2026
New rules take effect
Implementation date for the 10 and 15 year settlement requirements.
- 82026
Our response: judicial review
Filing collective action to challenge the unfair policy change.
Government claims versus reality
Government says
"Settlement must be earned through longer residence." "This reduces fiscal costs and promotes integration." "We're not removing anyone's existing right."
The reality
Skilled workers are net contributors to the UK economy and have already earned it through taxes, work and community contribution. Skilled migrants contribute £6 billion+ annually, and keeping them in limbo longer costs more in visa fees, healthcare surcharge and admin costs. Changing the rules mid-journey is removing a right: people came here under a promise, and that promise is being broken.
Voices of those affected
Real stories from skilled migrants impacted by this policy change.
NHS worker
"I came to help during COVID. I was promised 5 years to settlement. Now they want 15? I have a family, a mortgage, a life here. This isn't fair."
Software engineer
"I turned down jobs in other countries because UK promised 5-year settlement. I bought a house, my kids are in school. Moving the goalposts now is a betrayal."
Care worker
"I left my country to care for elderly British citizens. I was told 5 years. Now 15? How can I plan my life? Will I ever belong?"
About Wesbridge Associates
We are not just representing you, we are one of you. This challenge is personal.
Who we are
Wesbridge Associates Limited is a regulated immigration advisory firm, founded by migrants who understand the challenges firsthand. Our team members have personally experienced the UK immigration system, and we are regulated by the Immigration Advisers Authority (IAA).
Why we're leading this
This is not just a legal case for us. Many in our team came to the UK under the promise of the 5-year settlement route. We understand the fear, uncertainty and frustration of having the rules changed mid-journey, and we believe in standing up for what is right, even when it is difficult.
Amplify your voice
Every affected migrant deserves to be heard. We are creating a platform where your voice counts.
Collective platform
Strength in numbers. Together, we have the power to challenge unjust policy changes.
Access to justice
Regardless of financial means, every affected person should have access to legal challenge.
Government accountability
We will hold the government accountable for fairness in policy implementation.
How we will pursue this challenge
- 1Step 1
Collective instruction model
All claimants will collectively instruct legal representatives. One unified voice carries more weight than individual challenges.
- 2Step 2
Expert legal team
We will engage experienced judicial review solicitors and barristers with proven track records in immigration and public law.
- 3Step 3
Full transparency
Regular updates on case progress, legal strategy and financial reporting to all registered claimants.
- 4Step 4
Strength in numbers
A collective action demonstrates the scale of those affected and strengthens our legal arguments.
- 1Step 1
Collective instruction model
All claimants will collectively instruct legal representatives. One unified voice carries more weight than individual challenges.
- 2Step 2
Expert legal team
We will engage experienced judicial review solicitors and barristers with proven track records in immigration and public law.
- 3Step 3
Full transparency
Regular updates on case progress, legal strategy and financial reporting to all registered claimants.
- 4Step 4
Strength in numbers
A collective action demonstrates the scale of those affected and strengthens our legal arguments.
Fairness
People made life-altering decisions based on government promises. Breaking those promises is fundamentally unfair.
Dangerous precedent
If the government can change the rules mid-journey without protection, what stops them from doing it again?
Human cost
Real families, real careers and real lives are being disrupted. These are not just numbers, they are people.
Democratic accountability
The government must be held to standards of fairness and proper process in policy-making.
Future migrants
Protecting today's migrants protects tomorrow's skilled workforce. This affects everyone.
Economic impact
Skilled migrants contribute billions to the UK economy. Uncertainty damages both people and prosperity.
Donation transparency: where your money goes
Complete transparency on how every penny is used. The legal fund target is £100,000.
Ring-fenced funds
All donations are held in a separate, dedicated bank account exclusively for the Earned Settlement judicial review.
Protected purpose
These funds cannot be used for any other Wesbridge Associates business purposes. They are protected for this legal challenge only.
Full audit trail
Complete financial records are maintained and available for independent audit at any time.
Complete documentation
Every expense is documented with receipts, invoices and clear categorisation.
Legal fees (primary allocation)
Solicitor fees for preparing judicial review grounds and evidence bundles; barrister fees for court representation and legal opinions; and court filing fees and administrative costs.
Expert witnesses and evidence
Immigration policy experts to provide specialist evidence, economists to demonstrate the fiscal contribution of skilled migrants, and human rights specialists where applicable.
Case preparation and administration
Document collation and evidence gathering from claimants, witness statement preparation and verification, and translation services where needed.
Communication and awareness
Regular updates to all registered claimants on case progress, media and public awareness campaigns, and website hosting and technology costs for the claimant portal.
Every three months we will publish a detailed breakdown of all income and expenditure to all registered claimants. A running total and category breakdown will be published on this page, updated monthly. If we raise more than needed, or if circumstances change, any unused funds will either be returned proportionally to donors (the preferred option) or donated to a migrant rights charity chosen by claimant vote. We welcome independent audit of our financial records at any time.
What if we do not proceed to court?
- If the government changes policy favourably before we proceed, unused funds will be returned to donors
- If legal advice determines the case is unviable, donors will be consulted on how to use remaining funds
- We will never use these funds for anything other than this legal challenge or purposes agreed by donors
How we protect your data
Your privacy and data protection are our priorities. We handle your personal information with care and responsibility.
Limited purpose
Your data is collected solely for this judicial review case and will never be used for marketing or sold to third parties.
Legal team access only
Only our registered legal team and authorised case managers can access your personal information.
Secure storage
All data is encrypted and stored securely using industry-standard security measures and protocols.
UK GDPR compliant
We fully comply with UK GDPR and all relevant data protection regulations.
Your rights
You can request access to, correction of, or deletion of your data at any time by contacting us.
Data retention
We will only retain your data for as long as necessary for the case, after which it will be securely deleted.
Respond to the official consultation
Deadline: 12 February 2026
In addition to joining our judicial review, you can submit your own response to the government consultation before it closes on 12 February 2026. Tell them how this policy affects you, your family and your future in the UK.
How to get involved
- 1Step 1
Register your interest
Contact us to join the collective action. This helps us understand the scale of those affected and strengthens the case.
- 2Step 2
Share your story
Your personal experience matters. Tell us how this policy change has affected your plans, your family and your life in the UK. These stories will be crucial evidence in our legal challenge.
- 3Step 3
Support the legal challenge
Judicial reviews are expensive but necessary. Every contribution helps us build a stronger case and cover legal costs. Even small donations make a difference.
- 4Step 4
Spread the word
Share this page with other skilled migrants, employers, and anyone who cares about fairness in immigration policy. The more people who join, the stronger our collective voice.
- 1Step 1
Register your interest
Contact us to join the collective action. This helps us understand the scale of those affected and strengthens the case.
- 2Step 2
Share your story
Your personal experience matters. Tell us how this policy change has affected your plans, your family and your life in the UK. These stories will be crucial evidence in our legal challenge.
- 3Step 3
Support the legal challenge
Judicial reviews are expensive but necessary. Every contribution helps us build a stronger case and cover legal costs. Even small donations make a difference.
- 4Step 4
Spread the word
Share this page with other skilled migrants, employers, and anyone who cares about fairness in immigration policy. The more people who join, the stronger our collective voice.
Join the claim
Register as a claimant or support the legal fund
Registering records your interest in the judicial review and helps establish the scale of those affected. It does not commit you to any cost.
- Registered claimants
- —
- Raised so far
- —
- Supporters
- —
- Days remaining
- —
Related
Other routes worth checking
Skilled Worker visa
The sponsored work route most directly affected by the proposed changes.
Read moreHealth and Care Worker visa
The route facing the largest proposed increase, from 5 years to 15.
Read moreIndefinite Leave to Remain
The current settlement requirements, and how to apply before April 2026.
Read moreReady when you are
Speak to an adviser about your position
If you are close to five years of continuous residence, timing matters. Book a consultation with an IAA-regulated adviser to work out where you stand before the rules change.