UK Immigration Legal Advice: Who Can Help You Succeed?

UK immigration legal advice can lawfully be provided only by individuals registered with the Office of the Immigration Services Commissioner (OISC) or qualified members of designated professional bodies such as the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) or the Bar Standards Board (BSB). Choosing the right professional depends on whether your matter requires a standard Home Office application, complex discretionary submissions, an appeal before the First-tier Tribunal, or Judicial Review proceedings. Qualified advisers ensure your application strictly satisfies the UK Immigration Rules, meets mandatory evidentiary thresholds, and protects your lawful status.

Legal Framework: Who Can Lawfully Provide UK Immigration Advice?

Under Section 84 of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999, it is a criminal offence for any person to provide immigration advice or immigration services in the United Kingdom unless they are qualified to do so. A person is defined as qualified only if they are registered with the Office of the Immigration Services Commissioner (OISC) or are an authorised member of a designated qualifying regulator, such as the Law Society of England and Wales, the Bar Council, or the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx).

Section 91 of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 establishes that individuals who provide unauthorised immigration advice or services face prosecution, potentially resulting in a fine, imprisonment for up to two years, or both. The law draws a strict distinction between general administrative support (such as translating documents or typing forms under direct client instruction) and providing legal advice. Legal advice includes assessing eligibility under the Immigration Rules, recommending a specific immigration route, drafting bespoke legal representations, or communicating with the Home Office on an applicant's behalf.

Prospective applicants must be vigilant against unregulated intermediaries, often operating as ghost consultants or informal visa agents. Unregulated individuals carry no professional indemnity insurance, are not bound by statutory codes of conduct, and cannot represent applicants before the Home Office or the Immigration and Asylum Tribunal. Submissions made through unauthorised channels frequently result in refusals due to non-compliance with procedural requirements, leaving applicants with no regulatory recourse or financial protection.

Types of Authorised Immigration Advisers and Their Regulatory Scopes

The UK legal framework provides multiple avenues for obtaining professional immigration advice. The appropriate tier or type of professional depends on the complexity of your legal circumstances, whether the application falls inside or outside the standard Immigration Rules, and whether litigation or tribunal advocacy is required.

OISC-Regulated Advisers (Levels 1, 2, and 3)

The Office of the Immigration Services Commissioner is an independent public body established by Parliament to regulate immigration advisers across the United Kingdom. OISC advisers are categorised into three distinct competency levels, each granting specific permissions regarding the complexity of casework they can undertake.

• OISC Level 1 (Initial Advice and Straightforward Applications): Level 1 advisers are authorised to handle standard, entry clearance, and permission to stay applications that fall strictly within the Immigration Rules. This includes standard visitor visas, straightforward student applications, standard family route extensions where all mandatory financial requirements are met, and straightforward Skilled Worker or temporary work applications. Level 1 advisers cannot handle complex human rights claims, discretionary applications outside the rules, applications involving criminal convictions or serious adverse immigration history, or any contentious appeals work.
• OISC Level 2 (Casework and Complex Applications): Level 2 advisers are permitted to handle more demanding cases, including applications made outside the standard Immigration Rules under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), discretionary leave applications, human rights claims, complex family applications involving domestic abuse or child welfare, and initial asylum claims. They are qualified to draft comprehensive legal representations and lodge initial applications for Administrative Review. However, Level 2 advisers are not permitted to represent clients in oral hearings before the First-tier Tribunal.
• OISC Level 3 (Advocacy and Representation): Level 3 represents the highest tier of OISC accreditation. Advisers at this level are fully authorised to conduct contentious proceedings before the First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) and the Upper Tribunal. They draft formal grounds of appeal, prepare complete tribunal bundles, submit witness statements, and conduct full oral advocacy in court. Level 3 advisers can also prepare pre-action protocol letters for Judicial Review challenges, though they must refer the formal conduct of court litigation in the High Court or Upper Tribunal to an authorised solicitor or direct-access barrister.

Solicitors and Legal Executives (SRA and CILEx Regulation)

Solicitors in England and Wales are regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), while Chartered Legal Executives are regulated by CILEx Regulation. Law firms operating under the SRA possess general legal authorisation, meaning they can handle the full spectrum of immigration matters from initial application to complex appellate work.

Solicitors maintain the statutory right to conduct litigation. This right allows them to issue formal Judicial Review proceedings in the Upper Tribunal or the Administrative Court of the High Court when challenging unlawful Home Office decisions, policy breaches, or unreasonable administrative delays. SRA-regulated firms must hold comprehensive professional indemnity insurance and maintain strict client accounts for handling client funds and disbursements.

Barristers (Bar Standards Board and Direct Public Access)

Barristers are regulated by the Bar Standards Board (BSB) and specialise in courtroom advocacy, legal drafting, and providing formal legal opinions on intricate points of law. Traditionally, barristers were instructed exclusively by solicitors on behalf of a client. However, under the Direct Access scheme, members of the public can instruct specially trained Public Access barristers directly without going through a solicitor.

Public Access barristers can advise on the merits of a visa application, draft legal grounds for appeal, and represent clients in tribunal hearings. Unless a barrister has obtained additional specific authorisation from the BSB to conduct litigation, the client remains responsible for the formal administrative filing and service of court documents during Judicial Review proceedings.

Summary of Authorised Advisers and Competency Scopes

The following table outlines the regulatory authority, permitted scope of work, appellate rights, and litigation authority across the primary categories of UK immigration legal professionals.

Step-by-Step Process: Working with an Immigration Adviser

Engaging professional legal assistance follows a structured procedural workflow designed to ensure regulatory compliance, complete evidentiary validation, and rigorous legal drafting.

[Step 1: Consultation & Client Care Letter]
                    │
                    ▼
[Step 2: Eligibility Audit & Route Selection] ──(Condition Not Met)──► [Explore Alternative Route / Rectify Deficit]
                    │ (Meets Rules)
                    ▼
[Step 3: Evidentiary Audit & Gap Analysis] ───(Missing Evidence)───► [Procure Compliant Secondary Evidence]
                    │ (Fully Evidenced)
                    ▼
[Step 4: Application Drafting & Legal Representations]
                    │
                    ▼
[Step 5: Submission, Fee Payment & Biometrics Appointment]
                    │
                    ▼
[Step 6: Home Office Decision Received] ───────(Refusal Issued)─────► [Administrative Review / Appeal / Reapplication]
                    │ (Grant Issued)
                    ▼
[Post-Grant Status Check & Compliance Briefing]

Step 1: Initial Assessment and Conflict of Interest Checks

Before undertaking any substantive legal work, an authorised adviser must perform mandatory identity verification and conflict of interest checks. The adviser collects preliminary background details, including current immigration status, expiry dates of existing leave, travel history, criminal records, and prior Home Office refusals.

Following the assessment, the adviser issues a formal Client Care Letter (or Terms of Engagement). Under regulatory rules, this document must clearly define:

• The precise scope of instructions agreed upon.
• The agreed fee structure (fixed fee or hourly rate) and anticipated disbursements (Home Office fees, Immigration Health Surcharge, biometric appointment charges).
• The designated legal adviser handling the file and their supervisor.
• The internal complaints procedure and external regulatory contact details.

No legal work should proceed until both the client and adviser have agreed to and signed the Client Care documentation.

Step 2: Route Selection and Eligibility Audit

The adviser conducts an exhaustive legal assessment against the specific appendices of the Immigration Rules governing the chosen category. For example, a skilled worker applicant is assessed under Appendix Skilled Worker, Appendix Skilled Occupations, and Appendix ATAS (if applicable), while a partner applicant is evaluated under Appendix FM and Appendix FM-SE.

Decision Point: What happens if a core requirement cannot be satisfied? If an applicant fails to meet a mandatory requirement, such as the minimum financial threshold or English language proficiency, the adviser must not submit an application destined for refusal. Instead, the adviser evaluates whether:

1. The deficit can be cured prior to the submission date (for example, waiting for a bank balance to mature to satisfy the 28-day holding rule).
2. An alternative immigration route is available for which the applicant meets all statutory criteria.
3. Exceptional circumstances exist under human rights provisions (such as insurmountable obstacles to family life outside the UK under paragraph EX.1 of Appendix FM) that justify an application outside the standard rules.

Step 3: Evidentiary Audit and Gap Analysis

The legal adviser compiles a tailored Document Checklist specific to the applicant's circumstances. As documents are received, the adviser performs a gap analysis to ensure every piece of evidence conforms to the strict format, date range, and content requirements set out in the relevant appendices.

If third-party evidence (such as an employer letter or foreign marriage certificate) does not contain mandatory statutory wording or certified translations, the adviser requests corrected documentation from the issuing authority before progressing.

Step 4: Drafting Legal Representations and Application Submission

The adviser prepares the online Home Office application form and drafts comprehensive legal representations (also known as a legal cover letter). These representations:

• Reference specific paragraphs of the Immigration Rules.
• Set out how each individual requirement is fulfilled with direct cross-references to the supporting evidence bundle.
• Address any potential vulnerabilities or complex elements (such as historical gaps in lawful status, previous visa refusals, or self-employment income calculations).
• Cite relevant case law, Home Office published policy guidance, or statutory human rights considerations where applicable.

Step 5: Post-Submission Management, Biometrics, and Caseworker Inquiries

Once the online form is submitted and statutory fees are paid, the adviser uploads the indexed and paginated evidence bundle to the designated commercial partner portal (such as TLScontact, VFS Global, or UKVCAS). The applicant then attends a biometric appointment to provide fingerprints and facial imaging.

During processing, Home Office caseworkers may issue a formal request for further information or clarification. Regulated advisers manage these communications, ensuring responses are prepared and submitted within the strict deadlines specified by UK Visas and Immigration (UKVI), typically 10 to 14 working days.

Step 6: Decision Receipt, Administrative Review, Appeals, or Reapplication

Upon receipt of the decision notice from UKVI, the adviser examines the outcome:

• Grant of Leave: The adviser verifies that the biometric residence permit, digital status (eVisa), expiry date, conditions of stay, and right to work endorsements are correct. Any clerical errors must be reported to the Home Office immediately for correction.
• Refusal of Application: If the application is refused, the adviser analyzes the statutory refusal notice to determine whether the decision contains appealable errors of fact or law. The adviser will recommend one of three pathways:
  1. Administrative Review: Challenging a case working error where points-based criteria were wrongly evaluated.
  2. Immigration Appeal: Lodging an appeal with the First-tier Tribunal within 14 calendar days (in-country) or 28 calendar days (out-of-country) if the refusal involves a human rights or protection claim.
  3. Fresh Application: Submitting a new, fully evidenced application where the refusal was caused by a clear evidentiary omission that cannot be cured on review or appeal.

What Home Office Caseworkers Look for: Evidence and Evidentiary Scrutiny

UKVI caseworkers are bound by standard operating procedures and published decision-maker guidance. Understanding caseworker scrutiny allows legal advisers to build bundles that satisfy both mandatory legal tests and administrative verification standards.

[Caseworker Evidence Audit]
       │
       ├─► [Appendix FM-SE: Strict Financial Formatting & 28-Day Rule]
       ├─► [Appendix Continuous Residence: 180-Day Rule Audit & Evidence]
       ├─► [Points-Based Work: Sponsor Licence, CoS Authenticity, SOC Codes]
       ├─► [Part 9 Suitability: Mandatory/Discretionary Grounds for Refusal]
       └─► [Document Verification: Direct Checks with Banks, HMRC, Awarding Bodies]

Mandatory and Specified Evidence (Appendix FM-SE and Points-Based Routes)

Many immigration routes require evidence to be provided in a highly prescribed format. Under Appendix FM-SE (Specified Evidence), failure to submit a document containing every required statutory data point allows the caseworker to refuse the application without requesting clarification.

For employment income, caseworkers cross-examine payslips against matching personal bank statements showing the exact net deposits. The employer letter must confirm gross and net pay, duration of employment, contract type (permanent or fixed-term), and verify that the payslips are authentic.

Financial Requirement Verification

Caseworkers apply rigorous checks to all financial evidence:

• The 28-Day Rule: Personal bank statements used to demonstrate cash savings or maintenance funds must not be older than 28 days on the date of the online application submission.
• Holding Period Integrity: For cash savings routes, funds must have been held continuously at or above the required minimum threshold for the full six-month period preceding the application date.
• Unregulated Financial Institutions: The Home Office checks bank statements against its published list of financial institutions where verification checks cannot be conducted. Funds held in non-compliant institutions are rejected outright.
• Direct Third-Party Verification: Caseworkers routinely contact banking institutions, HMRC, and accountants directly to verify the authenticity of balances, tax returns, and corporate accounts. Any discrepancy between declared income and HMRC records triggers an immediate investigation under Part 9 of the Immigration Rules.

Genuine Relationship and Cohabitation Scrutiny

For partner and spouse applications under Appendix FM, caseworkers evaluate whether the relationship is genuine and subsisting, and whether the couple intends to live together permanently in the UK.

Caseworkers look for official, third-party documentary evidence spanning a continuous two-year period if the couple is cohabiting. Preferred evidence includes:

• Joint utility bills (gas, electricity, water).
• Joint tenancy agreements or mortgage statements.
• Official correspondence from government departments (HMRC, DWP, local council tax bills).
• Joint bank statements used for day-to-day living expenses.

Items of correspondence addressed individually to each applicant at the same residential address are acceptable if spread evenly across the qualifying period from at least three to four different official sources.

Employment and Sponsorship Legitimacy

In business immigration routes such as the Skilled Worker route, caseworkers assess the validity of the Certificate of Sponsorship (CoS) and the genuineness of the underlying vacancy. Caseworkers scrutinise:

• Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) Code: Ensuring the assigned SOC code genuinely reflects the job description, daily responsibilities, and necessary qualifications rather than an inflated code chosen solely to meet salary thresholds.
• Minimum Salary Compliance: Ensuring the salary meets both the general baseline threshold and the specific going rate for the SOC code, calculated precisely according to weekly contracted hours.
• Genuine Vacancy Test: Assessing whether the sponsoring employer has created a sham role primarily to facilitate the immigration of a specific individual.

Document Format, Translation, and Verification Standards

Every foreign-language document submitted to the Home Office must be accompanied by a full, certified English or Welsh translation. The translation must include:

• Written confirmation from the translator that it is an accurate translation of the original document.
• The date of the translation.
• The full name and signature of the translator or an authorised official of the translation company.
• The translator's or company's contact details and accreditation credentials.

Submitting uncertified translations or failing to provide original-language source documents alongside translations routinely results in the complete exclusion of that evidence from the caseworker's assessment.

Common Mistakes and Primary Refusal Triggers

Immigration refusals frequently stem from avoidable procedural and evidentiary oversights rather than fundamental ineligibility. Regulated legal advice identifies and neutralises these risks before submission.

Failure to Meet Specified Evidence Rules

Submitting alternative evidence that seems reasonable to an applicant will not suffice if the Immigration Rules specify a precise document format. For example, submitting dividend vouchers without accompanying corporate bank accounts, company accounts, and evidence of Companies House filings under Category F or G of Appendix FM-SE leads to automatic refusal, as caseworkers have limited discretion to waive missing mandatory specified documents.

Breaching the 28-Day Rule for Financial Evidence

A recurring error occurs when applicants obtain bank statements early in their preparation process. If the closing date of the most recent bank statement is dated 29 days or more before the online application fee is paid, the evidence is legally invalid, leading to refusal under mandatory financial requirements.

Falling Foul of General Grounds for Refusal (Part 9: Suitability and Deception)

Part 9 of the Immigration Rules contains mandatory and discretionary grounds for refusal relating to suitability, past conduct, and character. Primary refusal triggers include:

• Non-Disclosure of Previous Refusals: Failing to declare a previous visa refusal for any country (not just the UK) is interpreted by the Home Office as deception under paragraph 9.7.1 or false representation under paragraph 9.7.2. A finding of deception carries a mandatory 10-year re-entry ban for subsequent entry clearance applications.
• Unspent Criminal Convictions: Failing to disclose criminal cautions, driving offences, or convictions, even if considered minor by the applicant.
• Outstanding NHS Debts: Holding an unpaid NHS debt of £500 or more that has been reported to the Home Office results in mandatory refusal under paragraph 9.11.1 until the debt is settled in full.
• Litigation Debt: Having unpaid Home Office litigation costs awarded by a court leads to refusal under paragraph 9.12.1.

Submitting Incompatible or Expired English Language Certificates

Applicants must prove their English language ability through an approved provider on the Home Office list of Secure English Language Tests (SELT), such as IELTS SELT Consortium, Pearson, Trinity College London, or LanguageCert. Submitting non-SELT versions of these exams (such as standard academic IELTS) or testing with non-approved providers leads to immediate refusal.

Misunderstanding Section 3C Leave and Timing Application Submissions

Section 3C of the Immigration Act 1971 extends an individual's existing immigration leave automatically while an in-time application for permission to stay remains pending. An application is in-time only if it is submitted before the midnight expiry of the existing visa.

If an application is submitted even one day late, the applicant becomes an overstayer, Section 3C protection does not engage, right to work and rent protections cease immediately, and the applicant risks triggering mandatory re-entry bans under Part 9 of the Rules.

Sponsoring Employer Procedural Errors

For sponsored workers, errors made by the sponsoring employer in the Sponsor Management System (SMS) compromise the worker's application. Common employer mistakes include:

• Selecting an incorrect Certificate of Sponsorship type (Defined CoS for out-of-country applicants versus Undefined CoS for in-country applicants).
• Understating weekly working hours, which inflates the calculated hourly pay rate against the statutory minimum going rate.
• Failing to report material changes in employment start dates within the mandatory 10 working day notification window.

Complex Edge Cases and Specialised Scenarios

Complex immigration matters require advanced legal analysis, precise statutory interpretation, and strategic evidentiary preparation.

Dependants and Split Family Considerations

Bringing dependants to the UK involves complex legal hurdles when family units do not apply simultaneously or when circumstances diverge from traditional arrangements.

• Sole Responsibility: Under family and economic routes, when a single parent applies to bring a child to the UK without the other biological parent, they must prove they have exercised sole responsibility for the child's upbringing. Caseworkers apply an exceptionally high evidentiary bar, examining who makes all major decisions regarding education, medical care, and religious upbringing. Financial support alone is insufficient to establish sole responsibility.
• Section 55 Duty: Under Section 55 of the Borders, Citizenship and Immigration Act 2009, the Home Office has a statutory duty to safeguard and promote the welfare of children in the UK. Legal representatives use Section 55 arguments to challenge refusals that would result in separating children from their primary caregivers.

Continuous Residence and Permitted Absences

Applicants seeking Indefinite Leave to Remain (settlement) across routes such as Skilled Worker, Innovator Founder, Global Talent, or Long Residence must satisfy the continuous residence requirements under Appendix Continuous Residence.

• The 180-Day Rule: The applicant must not have spent more than 180 days outside the UK in any rolling 12-month period during the qualifying continuous residence period.
• Allowable Exceptions: Absences exceeding the 180-day limit break continuous residence unless they fall under specific statutory exceptions. These include assisting with national or international humanitarian crises, travel disruptions caused by natural disasters or pandemics, or compelling personal circumstances such as life-threatening illness of the applicant or a close family member. These exceptions require comprehensive medical and evidentiary verification to be accepted by caseworkers.

Transitional Arrangements and Changing Rules

UK immigration policy frequently updates baseline salary thresholds, qualifying criteria, and dependant entitlements. Navigating transitional provisions is critical for individuals already on a pathway to settlement.

• Partner Route Thresholds: When financial requirements are adjusted, individuals granted permission before specific implementation dates may benefit from transitional arrangements, protecting them from higher income thresholds on subsequent extension and settlement applications.
• Skilled Worker Salary Baselines: Sponsoring employers and workers must verify whether an applicant qualifies for lower transitional going rates or if they are subject to updated baseline salary requirements under current Immigration Rules.

Employer Duties and Sponsor Licence Compliance

Organisations holding a Worker or Temporary Worker Sponsor Licence are subject to stringent administrative duties audited by UKVI compliance officers. Failure to maintain compliance puts all sponsored personnel at immediate risk of visa curtailment.

[Sponsor Licence Compliance Framework]
                │
                ├─► [Pre-Licence: Genuine Vacancy Audit & Key Personnel Setup]
                ├─► [Operational: SMS Management & CoS Allocation]
                ├─► [Monitoring: Right to Work Verification & Record Keeping (Appendix D)]
                ├─► [Reporting: 10/20-Day SMS Notifications (Absence, Promotion, Resignation)]
                └─► [Enforcement Risk: Action Plan, Licence Suspension, Revocation]

• Appendix D Document Retention: Sponsors must retain copies of right to work checks, employment contracts, payroll records, qualifications, and biometric residence cards for every sponsored worker.
• Reporting Duties: Sponsors must report events via the SMS within 10 working days, including worker unapproved absences exceeding 10 consecutive days, resignations, early contract terminations, or promotions involving SOC code changes.
• Consequences of Licence Downgrading or Revocation: If a sponsor's licence is revoked, all sponsored workers have their visas curtailed to 60 calendar days (or to their existing expiry date, whichever is shorter). During this window, workers must secure a new licensed sponsor or leave the UK.

In-Country Switching and Immigration Bail Restrictions

Not all visa holders can change their immigration category while remaining inside the UK. The Immigration Rules prohibit in-country switching from specific temporary categories, including:

• Standard Visitor visas.
• Short-term Study visas.
• Seasonal Worker routes.
• Parent of a Child at School routes.

Individuals holding these categories must depart the UK and submit an Entry Clearance application from their country of legal residence. Furthermore, individuals residing in the UK on Immigration Bail are strictly prohibited from switching into any substantive points-based or work routes from within the country.

Timing Criticalities: Section 3C Leave, Overstaying, and Paragraph 39E

Maintaining continuous lawful status requires meticulous calendar management. When a visa approaches expiry, an applicant must submit a valid variation application prior to the expiration timestamp.

• Operation of Section 3C Leave: If an in-time application is submitted, Section 3C extends the applicant's existing permission and conditions (such as work permissions) until the application is decided, and during any subsequent in-time Administrative Review or appeal.
• Paragraph 39E Discretion: Paragraph 39E of the Immigration Rules provides limited discretion for overstaying to be disregarded where an application is made within 14 calendar days of the applicant's leave expiring, provided there was a good reason beyond the control of the applicant or their representative (such as emergency hospitalisation). This threshold is exceptionally strict, and minor administrative oversights or delays do not qualify.

Practical Due Diligence: Verifying and Instructing Your Adviser

Before formally instructing an immigration legal professional, applicants should conduct essential due diligence to ensure regulatory standing, transparent billing, and procedural security.

1. Confirm Regulatory Registration

Never rely solely on marketing claims or firm stationery. Verify the individual adviser and the firm directly on official regulatory databases:

• OISC Register: Search the OISC Register of Regulated Immigration Advisers on GOV.UK to confirm the firm's active registration status and exact permitted competency level (Level 1, 2, or 3).
• SRA Law Society Directory: Check the Solicitors Regulation Authority database ("Find a Solicitor") to verify the practising certificate and disciplinary record of a solicitor.
• BSB Barristers' Register: Consult the Bar Standards Board online register to ensure a barrister holds a current practising certificate and is authorised for Public Access work if you are instructing them directly.

2. Require Transparent Fee Agreements

Authorised advisers must provide transparent cost illustrations prior to engagement. Standard practice across reputable firms involves offering fixed-fee agreements for defined scopes of work (such as an end-to-end Skilled Worker visa application or a First-tier Tribunal appeal bundle), ensuring no unexpected costs arise.

Always ensure that Home Office application fees and the Immigration Health Surcharge are listed separately from professional legal fees, and clarify whether VAT is applicable to your instruction based on your country of residence.

3. Establish Clear Lines of Communication

Ensure that your legal services agreement explicitly identifies the named caseworker or solicitor responsible for your file. Clear communication channels, agreed response timeframes, and formal file management systems protect your application from being mishandled or delayed.

Next Steps

Navigating UK immigration requires strict adherence to statutory rules, procedural deadlines, and complex evidentiary criteria. If you are preparing an upcoming visa application, sponsoring international employees, or facing an adverse Home Office decision, secure professional advice early in the process. Ensure your chosen adviser is fully regulated by the OISC, SRA, or BSB, and obtain a formal written assessment of your eligibility before submitting documents or paying Home Office fees.

Reviewed by Wesbridge Associates team on 31 August 2026. We check our published guidance against GOV.UK and current Home Office rules.

Frequently asked questions

Common questions on this topic, answered by our advisers.

Who can provide UK immigration legal advice?

What is the difference between an OISC adviser and a solicitor for immigration?

How do I check if an immigration adviser is legitimate?

Can I apply for a UK visa without legal advice?

What should I expect from an initial consultation with an immigration adviser?

How much does UK immigration legal advice cost?